Presentations – weaselhat http://www.weaselhat.com Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:33:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.2 Computer Security in the Face of a Hostile Government http://www.weaselhat.com/2016/12/12/computer-security-in-the-face-of-a-hostile-government/ http://www.weaselhat.com/2016/12/12/computer-security-in-the-face-of-a-hostile-government/#respond Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:33:07 +0000 http://www.weaselhat.com/?p=620 I recently gave a talk to some Pomona College undergrads about how to secure their various devices (computers and phones in particular). I tried to focus on clear and concrete advice. I got tons of help on twitter, and I ultimately came up with a slides for a talk and a security checklist.

First: I’d like to encourage other people to give this talk. Let me know how it goes, and I’ll update the slides or checklist. I’m probably not the best person to do this sort of “lay” outreach. (It was hardly “lay” in any case—I think most of the audience were CS majors.) Maybe you are?

Second: I’d appreciate your feedback. I’d like to keep the slides and checklist up to date. I unfortunately don’t have the time right now to build up more permanent advice à la Decent Security.

Third: I am fundamentally on board with Taylor Swift’s attitude to security. There is so much fear and condescension around security that many people—even CS majors!—have turned off to it. While academic security research can be really interesting, it’s at least as important to have direct, concrete advice for people without significant expertise. In many ways we’re further along than we used to be—Signal, HDD encryption, SSL/TLS—but in some ways we’re worse off (JS drive-by attacks). Whose responsibility is it to educate and protect computer users, if not us? And if not now—when?

]]>
http://www.weaselhat.com/2016/12/12/computer-security-in-the-face-of-a-hostile-government/feed/ 0
PLVNET http://www.weaselhat.com/2014/12/02/plvnet/ http://www.weaselhat.com/2014/12/02/plvnet/#respond Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:51:17 +0000 http://www.weaselhat.com/?p=491 I’m really happy to be part of the first PLVNET, a workshop on the intersection of PL, verification, and networking. I have two abstracts up for discussion.

The first abstract, Temporal NetKAT, is about adding reasoning about packet histories to a network policy language like NetKAT. The work on this is moving along quite nicely (thanks in large part to Ryan Beckett!), and I’m looking forward to the conversations it will spark.

The second abstract, Type systems for SDN controllers, is about using type systems to statically guarantee the absence of errors in controller programs. Fancy new switches have tons of features, which can be tricky to operate—can we make sure that a controller doesn’t make any mistakes when it talks to a switch? Some things are easy, like making sure that the match/action rules are sent to tables that can handle them; some things are harder, like making sure the controller doesn’t fill up a switch’s tables. I think this kind of work is a nice complement to the NetKAT “whole policy” approach, a sort of OpenFlow 1.3+ version of VeriCon with slightly different goals.

Should be fun!

]]>
http://www.weaselhat.com/2014/12/02/plvnet/feed/ 0
NJPLS Fall 2012 http://www.weaselhat.com/2012/11/15/njpls-fall-2012/ http://www.weaselhat.com/2012/11/15/njpls-fall-2012/#respond Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:33:26 +0000 http://www.weaselhat.com/?p=354 Penn hosted NJPLS today. It’s been a while, but these local meetings are always fun. I presented on the status of my thesis work, Compiling Dynamic Information Flow Control. I’m building a compiler for λNaV (see our POPL submission).

One thing I omitted from the presentation—which came up more than once in conversations afterwards—is that my compiler uses LLVM as a backend. I parse a program, translate it to my own IR, optimize, and then send it off to LLVM. I’m not writing LLVM passes, or adding any kinds of AST nodes. Having my own IR probably isn’t the best architecture, but it’s much more agile than trying to modify LLVM itself. It also seems like a natural choice: my IR is tailored to reasoning about DIFC label lattices, while LLIR is particularly well suited for lower level languages, like C.

]]>
http://www.weaselhat.com/2012/11/15/njpls-fall-2012/feed/ 0
POPL 2010 http://www.weaselhat.com/2010/01/22/popl-2010/ http://www.weaselhat.com/2010/01/22/popl-2010/#comments Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:22:37 +0000 http://www.weaselhat.com/?p=197 POPL 2010 has been a blast, with lots of great papers and conversation. I presented Contracts Made Manifest at 10:30am today, and the follow-up discussions contained enough ideas for years of research. (So stay tuned!)

]]>
http://www.weaselhat.com/2010/01/22/popl-2010/feed/ 1