<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flapjax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right---there&#039;s no reason to laugh.  The situation isn&#039;t as dire as some would make it out to be, though: Haskell, Scala, and PLT Scheme are examples of theory and practice meeting (in some proportion).

Whenever I explain PL to people outside of computer science, they always assume that our study is comparative.  It would be interesting if, for a change, we did do a comparative study.  How do different abstractions and structures---of computation, of data, even of syntax---affect languages as real-world objects?  I&#039;m not interested in &quot;power&quot; or &quot;expressiveness&quot; per se, but rather how programming languages function socially.

I haven&#039;t liked what little of this sort of research I&#039;ve seen, though.  I&#039;m not sure how we should approach this idea or who would be willing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right&#8212;there&#8217;s no reason to laugh.  The situation isn&#8217;t as dire as some would make it out to be, though: Haskell, Scala, and PLT Scheme are examples of theory and practice meeting (in some proportion).</p>
<p>Whenever I explain PL to people outside of computer science, they always assume that our study is comparative.  It would be interesting if, for a change, we did do a comparative study.  How do different abstractions and structures&#8212;of computation, of data, even of syntax&#8212;affect languages as real-world objects?  I&#8217;m not interested in &#8220;power&#8221; or &#8220;expressiveness&#8221; per se, but rather how programming languages function socially.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t liked what little of this sort of research I&#8217;ve seen, though.  I&#8217;m not sure how we should approach this idea or who would be willing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artyom Shalkhakov</title>
		<link>http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Artyom Shalkhakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weaselhat.com/2006/10/12/flapjax/#comment-435</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I realise this is a very old post and such and such&#8230;</p>
<p>&gt; Shriram got me on board by asking me what would happen if PL people actually got together and wrote something for real — that is, fully implemented an idea and sent it out at the world in a language the world can use. We both chuckled for a moment, thinking how funny it would be to actually apply PL. And then he pointed out that there’s nothing funny about that at all.</p>
<p>Why chuckle? I&#8217;m really interested in seeing smart math applied to everyday problems (that&#8217;s why I learn and apply it :)). Maybe we could live in a better world then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

